Assessment 4 : Patient Family or Population Health Problem Solution
NURSFPXWRITERS.COM
NURS-FPX 4900
Locating Credible Databases and Research
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common and multifactorial respiratory illness that requires careful management and an extensive treatment plan. Evidence-based practice (EBP) is important for guaranteeing that interventions are both effective and tailored to patient needs. Continuous access to research articles necessitates using credible sources which helps healthcare professionals in their efforts to remain informed on the most effective strategies for managing COPD (Sorge & DeBlieux, 2020). In this paper, emphasis is placed on identifying proper databases and resources that can be used to obtain evidence particularly helpful in managing COPD. With knowledge acquired through research and cooperation, nurses are able to improve the quality of the patient’s treatment as well as the level of professional competency.
Communication Strategies
To effectively encourage nurses to research COPD and collaborate in resource access, applying specific communication strategies is necessary. One foundational strategy is the implementation of structured educational workshops that center on current research and evidence-based interventions for COPD. These workshops particularly emphasize techniques such as spirometry and smoking cessation, which are crucial in managing the disease effectively. These workshops promote discussion and inquiry about new knowledge, thereby strengthening the nurses’ comprehension and utilization of research. The establishment of a mentorship culture is useful. It also stated that experienced nurses can mentor less experienced members of the team by helping them use database sources and applying research findings to clinical practice. These teams can center on regular discussions about new COPD research from databases such as PubMed and CINAHL (Sandelowsky et al., 2021). It critically analyzes the evidence and considers its application to their clinical settings. This mentorship and teamwork guarantee that less experienced nurses receive support in navigating complex information. This collaborative framework improves their confidence in applying evidence-based care.
Benefits
There are many advantages of the communication strategies. By encouraging continuous professional development, nurses improve their clinical skills. Collaborative learning environments also help them develop critical thinking and decision-making capabilities. Such a continuous practice in EBP enhances the outcomes of patient care while developing a good professional relationship among the nursing staff (Fu et al., 2022). It not only helps to improve the competence of each individual nurse but also improves the effectiveness of the healthcare team as a whole. This promotes constant learning and collaboration among members of the clinical staff.
Best Place for Research Work
The best places for conducting research in a healthcare facility are the medical library in the hospital and the online databases that can be accessed in different working stations within the hospital. These databases are helpful because they include peer-reviewed articles, clinical practice guidelines, and current research on COPD management and care strategies. A hospital’s medical library usually has a subscription to comprehensive databases like Pub Med, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library (Brooks & Levy-Milne, 2022). This subscription provides access to a wide range of journals and articles centering on the current treatments and evidence-based practices for COPD. These resources are very helpful for collecting evidence on outcomes of interventions such as bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and oxygen therapy. In addition, the availability of the Internet in the workstations enables nurses to search for information at the point of care. This is particularly useful for quick reference checks and for incorporating the latest evidence into patient care plans. With these resources, nurses would be able to apply evidence-based recommendations and clinical best practices to the care of patients with COPD hence improving the nursing practice.
Reasons for Utilizing Places within Health Care Setting
It is especially advantageous to make use of these resources in the healthcare setting as it guarantees the information used is up to date with the hospital’s admission practices and regulations. In addition, research conducted on-site means direct access to the interdisciplinary team and consultation with them, as well as rapid implementation of newly obtained evidence into practice (Luckett et al., 2022). These resources guarantee fast evidence-based decisions by nurses, which improve patient results. Also, on-site research enables quick collaboration with other specialists, thus offering COPD patients fully integrated health solutions.
Ranking the Best Online Sources for COPD Research
When planning care for COPD it is essential to obtain up-to-date information from reliable sources of information on the internet. The following are five ranked sources that can be utilized to gather evidence specific to COPD:
PubMed: This is one of the largest medical databases that provide access to peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials, and guidelines on COPD. It includes studies on pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological interventions, and long-term care strategies (Xu et al., 2023). It is highly credible and contains current research thus it is the most helpful to the nurse looking for evidence based practice.
CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature): This database is particularly designed for nursing and allied health care fields. CINAHL provides a wealth of articles on nursing care and interventions related to COPD, making it especially valuable for nurses (Luckett et al., 2022). It is particularly useful for those searching for evidence on patient education, rehabilitation techniques, and the management of chronic symptoms.
Cochrane Library: This database has been widely used for systematic reviews and it would be helpful in assessing the impact of different COPD interventions. It provides accurate and research-based articles and summaries that assist nurses in decision making processes regarding the patients (Apessos et al., 2021).
Hospital’s Policy Database: Most hospitals have their own internal databases, which include the protocols and recommendations for managing patients with COPD. These are useful in as much as they will help maintain adherence to institutional and local legal requirements of care (Xiao et al., 2020).
Google Scholar: Google Scholar is a broader search engine than the Web of Science, one may continue to find many academic as well as clinical articles on COPD. However, it ranks the lowest in terms of specificity compared to the other sources. It can offer access to full-text articles and books that might not be immediately available in other databases.
The ranking of these sources for locating evidence on COPD starts with PubMed due to its vast and specialized medical content. Next is CINAHL, which offers articles specifically related to nursing and allied health, making it highly relevant for practical nursing interventions (Xiao et al., 2020). Cochrane Library is also necessary for COPD-specific guidelines and systematic reviews. Google Scholar also proves to be useful but not as selective for COPD as the Hospital’s Policy Database which contains crucial institutional recommendations.
Evaluating the Best Evidence Sources for COPD Management
For COPD, evaluating evidence sources that provide reliable, relevant, and up-to-date information is essential. PubMed is the choice source as it provides data from both types of quantitative and qualitative articles on COPD. These articles include epidemiology, efficacy, and outcomes. A number of such databases are available and further their use by being updated frequently to make available the latest studies (Xu et al., 2023). CINAHL is next and is aimed at nursing and allied health professionals. It is useful in the practical application of nursing research to patient care, including COPD patient care strategies and education (Xu et al., 2023). The Cochrane Library comprises systematic reviews and meta-analyses that summarize the findings of several studies; Therefore, these sources offer a high level of evidence regarding the efficacy and efficiency of the proposed treatments and interventions (Xu et al., 2023).
The criteria for assessing the relevance and usefulness of these sources include the credibility of the source, its peer-reviewed status, and the frequency of its updates. In the case of COPD, it is necessary to rely only on sources that provide evidence meeting the clinical guidelines and the protocols concerning patient care (Chen et al., 2021). It also helps guarantee that the interventions and care strategies to be used are evidence-based and current, improving patient care in practice environments.
Conclusion
The integration of evidence-based practice is crucial in improving quality care especially when it comes to the handling of COPD. Nurses can use online resources including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and specialized databases to improve their decision-making to modify the outcomes. Lastly, EBP helps maintain that nursing care is to improve the quality of life for patients with COPD and drive continuous improvements in respiratory care practices.
References
Apessos, I., Voulgaris, A., Agrafiotis, M., Andreadis, D., & Steiropoulos, P. (2021). Effect of periodontal therapy on COPD outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01429-2
Brooks, K., & Levy-Milne, R. (2022). Educating frontline health workers to support evidence-based management and treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy, 58, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2021-079
Chen, H., Liu, X., Gao, X., Lv, Y., Zhou, L., Shi, J., Wei, W., Huang, J., Deng, L., Wang, Z., Jin, Y., & Yu, W. (2021). Epidemiological evidence relating risk factors to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0261692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261692
Fu, Y., Chapman, E. J., Boland, A. C., & Bennett, M. I. (2022). Evidence-based management approaches for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A practice review. Palliative Medicine, 36(5), 770–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221079697
Luckett, T., Roberts, M., Smith, T., Garcia, M., Dunn, S., Swan, F., Ferguson, C., Kochovska, S., Phillips, J. L., Pearson, M., Currow, D. C., & Johnson, M. J. (2022). Implementing the battery-operated hand-held fan as an evidence-based, non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a qualitative study of the views of specialist respiratory clinicians. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01925-z
Sandelowsky, H., Weinreich, U. M., Aarli, B. B., Sundh, J., Høines, K., Stratelis, G., Løkke, A., Janson, C., Jensen, C., & Larsson, K. (2021). COPD – Do the Right Thing. BioMed Central Family Practice, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01583-w
Sorge, R., & DeBlieux, P. (2020). Acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A primer for emergency physicians. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 59(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.001
Xiao, L., Duan, H., Li, P., Wu, W., Shan, C., & Liu, X. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of Liuzijue in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BioMed Central Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03104-1
Xu, M., Wang, J., Li, S., & An, X. (2023). The current landscape of COPD-related clinical trials registered on the World Health Organization international clinical trials registry platform: A comprehensive analysis of study characteristics and publication Status. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases, 10(4), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0417
